Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 handle duplicate with set destructuration
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Javascript ES6 filter include vs Lodash intersection
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var first = [1, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 7]; var second = [2, 3, 5, 6];
Tests:
Javascript ES6 filter include
[...new Set(first.filter((item) => second.includes(item)))];
Lodash intersection
_.intersection(first, second)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Javascript ES6 filter include
Lodash intersection
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to find common elements between two arrays: 1. **Lodash Intersection**: Uses the `_.intersection` function from Lodash library to find the intersection of two arrays. 2. **ES6 filter + Set Deconstruction**: Uses JavaScript's built-in `filter` method to create a new array with only the elements that are present in another array, and then uses destructuring assignment (`[...new Set(...)]`) to extract the unique common elements. **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing two different approaches: 1. **Lodash Intersection**: This approach uses an external library (Lodash) to perform the intersection calculation. 2. **ES6 filter + Set Deconstruction**: This approach relies on JavaScript's built-in functions and features, specifically `filter` method and destructuring assignment. **Pros and Cons** ### Lodash Intersection Pros: * **Faster Execution**: The benchmark results show that Lodash's `_.intersection` function is faster than the ES6 filter + Set Deconstruction approach. * **Easier to Implement**: Using an external library can simplify the implementation, as it provides a pre-tested and optimized function. Cons: * **External Dependency**: Requires loading an additional library (Lodash), which may not be desirable in all situations. * **Higher Memory Footprint**: The benchmark results show that the Lodash approach uses more memory compared to the ES6 filter + Set Deconstruction approach. ### ES6 filter + Set Deconstruction Pros: * **No External Dependency**: This approach relies solely on JavaScript's built-in functions and features, making it a better choice for projects where external libraries are not allowed. * **Low Memory Footprint**: The benchmark results show that this approach uses less memory compared to the Lodash approach. Cons: * **More Complex Implementation**: Implementing this approach requires a good understanding of JavaScript's `filter` method and destructuring assignment. * **Slower Execution**: The benchmark results show that this approach is slower than the Lodash Intersection approach. **Library: Lodash** Lodash (pronounced "lodash") is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as: * Array manipulation * String manipulation * Object manipulation * Functional programming utilities The `_.intersection` function in particular is designed to find the intersection of two arrays, making it a useful tool for this benchmark. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** In this benchmark, we're using destructuring assignment (`[...new Set(...)]`) which is a JavaScript feature introduced in ES6 (ECMAScript 2015). This syntax allows us to extract unique elements from an array using the `Set` constructor and then spreading it back into an array. **Alternatives** If you need to find common elements between two arrays, other approaches could include: * Using the `reduce()` method with a accumulator function * Utilizing the `every()` method in combination with `includes()` * Implementing a custom solution using loops or recursion However, the Lodash Intersection approach and the ES6 filter + Set Deconstruction approach are two of the most common and efficient ways to solve this problem.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 includes
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 set has
Lodash Intersection vs. ES6 handle duplicate
Array Intersection vs. Set Intersection vs. Lodash - big
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?