Benchmark: includes-mapping-set

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
const arr = [] 
for(let i =0;i<300000;i++){
arr.push(i)
}

Tests:

includes
for(let i=0;i<10000;i++){ arr.includes(300000) }
mappiing
const map = {} const arrLen = arr.length for(let i=0;i<arrLen;i++){ map[arr[i]] = true } for(let i=0;i<10000;i++){ map[300000] }
set
const set = new Set(arr) for(let i=0;i<10000;i++){ set.has(300000) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes
mappiing
set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

mappiing

436/s

set

84/s

includes

3/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ mappiing	436 Ops/sec
set	84 Ops/sec
includes	3 Ops/sec

includes-mapping-set (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `includes vs mappiing vs set`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

includes

mappiing

set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

includes-mapping-set (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: includes vs mappiing vs set

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

includes

mappiing

set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `includes vs mappiing vs set`