Benchmark: init on demand vs at the beginning

Script Preparation code:

function a(arr) {
  let kinds;
  return (node) => {
    kinds ??= new Set(arr);
    return kinds.has(node.kind);
  };
}

function b(arr) {
  const kinds = new Set(arr);
  return (node) => kinds.has(node.kind);
}
const c = a([1, 2, 3]);
const d = b([1, 2, 3]);

Tests:

includes
return c({kind: 1});
lookup
return d({kind: 1});

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes
lookup

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.4 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

lookup

649.8M/s

includes

188.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ lookup	649,772,160 Ops/sec
includes	188,384,832 Ops/sec

init on demand vs at the beginning (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `includes vs lookup`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

includes

lookup

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

init on demand vs at the beginning (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: includes vs lookup

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

includes

lookup

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `includes vs lookup`