Benchmark: eval vs new Function vs function(Sample JS Functions) 2

Script Preparation code:

var newFunc = new Function("let r = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7).includes('x');");
var regular = function(){
let r = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7).includes('x');;
}

Tests:

eval
eval("let r = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7).includes('x');");
new Function
newFunc();
regular
regular()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
eval
new Function
regular

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

regular

5.5M/s

new Function

5.5M/s

eval

3.8M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ regular	5,533,500 Ops/sec
new Function	5,454,156 Ops/sec
eval	3,811,502 Ops/sec

eval vs new Function vs function(Sample JS Functions) 2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `eval vs new Function vs regular`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

eval

new Function

regular

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

eval vs new Function vs function(Sample JS Functions) 2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: eval vs new Function vs regular

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

eval

new Function

regular

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `eval vs new Function vs regular`