Benchmark: eval vs new Function (Sample JS Functions)2

Script Preparation code:

var newFunc = new Function("let r = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7).includes('x');");

Tests:

eval
eval("let r = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7).includes('x');");
new Function
newFunc();
navite
let r = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7).includes('x');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
eval
new Function
navite

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 133 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
eval	2056169.0 Ops/sec
new Function	4150807.0 Ops/sec
navite	4818729.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and its implications.

**Benchmark Overview**

The `MeasureThat.net` benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches to execute a JavaScript function:

1. `eval`
2. `new Function`
3. `native` (i.e., using native JavaScript syntax)

**What is being tested?**

In each test case, a simple JavaScript function is defined and executed:

* In `new Function`, a `Function` constructor is used to create a new function.
* In `eval`, the `eval` function is used to execute a string containing the code.
* In `native`, a native JavaScript syntax is used without the need for `new Function` or `eval`.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches on multiple browsers and devices.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **new Function**
	* Pros:
		+ Can be used to create complex functions with closures.
		+ Allows for flexibility in function creation.
	* Cons:
		+ May incur a performance overhead due to the creation of a new function object.
		+ May not be supported in older browsers or environments.
2. **eval**
	* Pros:
		+ Fast execution, as it directly executes the code without creating an intermediate function object.
		+ Can be used for simple functions with no closures.
	* Cons:
		+ May introduce security risks if used with untrusted input.
		+ Performance can degrade if the input code is large or complex.
3. **native**
	* Pros:
		+ Fast execution, as it does not require creating an intermediate function object.
		+ Supports closures and complex functions out-of-the-box.
	* Cons:
		+ May be slower than `new Function` for simple functions without closures.

**Library or special JS feature used:**

None of the provided benchmarks use a specific library. However, it's worth noting that `eval` can be vulnerable to security risks if not used carefully (e.g., with untrusted input). The `native` approach is generally considered safer and more efficient for simple functions.

**Special JS features or syntax:**

The `native` approach uses native JavaScript syntax without the need for `new Function` or `eval`. This allows for flexible function creation while maintaining performance. Note that the exact syntax may vary depending on the JavaScript engine and version used.

**Alternatives:**

If you're interested in alternatives to this benchmark, consider:

1. **Function constructor vs. String.prototype.replace()**: Compares the performance of creating a new function using `Function` versus replacing a string with a new value.
2. **eval vs. Function()**: Similar to the original benchmark, but compares only `eval` and `Function()` without `native`.
3. **Arrow functions vs. traditional functions**: Tests the performance of arrow functions versus traditional functions in various scenarios.

These alternative benchmarks can help you compare different JavaScript features and optimizations.

Related benchmarks:

eval vs new Function (Sample JS Functions)2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: eval vs new Function vs navite

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

eval

new Function

navite

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):