Benchmark: Clamp01 with various implementations

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

Using if
const clamp01 = (x) => { if (x <= 0) return 0; if (x >= 1) return 1; return x; } clamp01(0.5); clamp01(1e-30); clamp01(-1); clamp01(1.5); clamp01(0); clamp01(1); clamp01(Infinity); clamp01(-Infinity); clamp01(NaN);
Using ternary
const clamp01 = (x) => { return (x < 0) ? 0 : ((x > 1) ? 1 : x); } clamp01(0.5); clamp01(1e-30); clamp01(-1); clamp01(1.5); clamp01(0); clamp01(1); clamp01(Infinity); clamp01(-Infinity); clamp01(NaN);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using if
Using ternary

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 14; Mobile; rv:153.0) Gecko/153.0 Firefox/153.0

Browser/OS: Firefox Mobile 153 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Using ternary

38.9M/s

Using if

38.8M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Using ternary	38,910,032 Ops/sec
Using if	38,831,368 Ops/sec

Clamp01 with various implementations (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Using if vs Using ternary`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Using if

Using ternary

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Clamp01 with various implementations (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Using if vs Using ternary

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Using if

Using ternary

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Using if vs Using ternary`