Benchmark: Set has vs object key bigger list

Script Preparation code:

var obj = (new Array(100000)).fill(null).reduce((prev, newVal) => {prev[Math.random() + ''] = Math.random() + ''; return prev; }, { sausage: 'tst' });
var array = Object.keys(obj);
var set = new Set(array);

Tests:

Includes
array.includes('sausage')
Object[key]
obj['sausage']
Set.has
set.has('saudage')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Includes
Object[key]
Set.has

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Includes	121257752.0 Ops/sec
Object[key]	104016992.0 Ops/sec
Set.has	147995904.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

array includes vs object key
Set has vs object key
Set has vs object keyx
Set has vs object key reversed
Set has vs prop in object
array includes vs object key vs set
Set has vs object key 3
Set has vs object key vs map has
Set has vs object key vs Array includes (key is at the end)

Set has vs object key bigger list (version: 1)

performance comparison of ways to find if an array contains a value

Comparing performance of: Includes vs Object[key] vs Set.has

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Includes

Object[key]

Set.has

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A