Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Underscore vs Lodash: isNaN
(version: 1)
Compare Underscore vs Lodash vs Native JS isNaN. Which is faster?
Comparing performance of:
Underscore vs Lodash vs Native JS
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> window.lodash = _; _ = null; </script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.9.1/underscore-min.js'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> window.underscore = _; _ = null; </script>
Script Preparation code:
var a = NaN;
Tests:
Underscore
underscore.isNaN(a);
Lodash
lodash.isNaN(a);
Native JS
Number.isNaN(NaN)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Underscore
Lodash
Native JS
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 132 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=585219" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Native JS
138.3M/s
Lodash
109.4M/s
Underscore
45.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Native JS
138,260,944 Ops/sec
Lodash
109,382,328 Ops/sec
Underscore
45,778,088 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Object comparison
Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?