Benchmark: Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  window.lodash = _;
  _ = null;
</script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.13.2/underscore-min.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  window.underscore = _;
  _ = null;
</script>

Script Preparation code:

var str1 ="awesome";
var str2 = "no";

Tests:

underscore
underscore.isEqual(str1, str2);
lodash
lodash.isEqual(str1, str2);
eq
function getType(obj) { return Object.prototype.toString.call(obj).slice(8, -1).toLowerCase(); } if (["object", "array"].includes(getType(str1))) { } else { str1 === str2 }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
underscore
lodash
eq

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/131.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

underscore

11.0M/s

5.4M/s

lodash

3.6M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ underscore	10,966,451 Ops/sec
eq	5,403,216 Ops/sec
lodash	3,640,370 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Explanation**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the website MeasureThat.net. The benchmark compares the execution performance of three different approaches to check if two strings are equal: `underscore.isEqual()`, `lodash.isEqual()`, and a custom implementation using a helper function `getType()`.

**Options Compared**

1. **_ (Underscore)**: This is an instance of the popular JavaScript utility library Underscore.js, which provides various functional programming helpers. The test case uses `_ = _;` to make the underscore variable global, and then calls `underscore.isEqual(str1, str2);`.
2. **_ (Lodash)**: Similar to Underscore, this is an instance of Lodash, another popular JavaScript utility library. The test case uses `window.lodash = _;` to make the lodash variable global, and then calls `lodash.isEqual(str1, str2);`. Note that in this benchmark, `_ = null;` is used to "disable" the underscore variable before calling its methods.
3. **Custom Implementation**: This approach uses a custom helper function `getType(obj)` to check if an object is an array or not. If it's not an array, it simply checks for strict equality using `str1 === str2`. The test case only includes this implementation for the "eq" benchmark.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **_ (Underscore)**:
	* Pros: Fast execution due to optimized native code.
	* Cons: External dependency on Underscore library, which may not be desirable in all scenarios.
2. **_ (Lodash)**:
	* Pros: Also fast execution due to optimized native code, and provides a wide range of utility functions.
	* Cons: Similar to Underscore, an external dependency that may not be desired.
3. **Custom Implementation**:
	* Pros: No external dependencies or overhead, allows for fine-grained control over the equality check logic.
	* Cons: May require more CPU cycles due to the custom implementation, and may not be as efficient as the native code optimizations in Underscore/Lodash.

**Library Description**

Both Underscore and Lodash are popular JavaScript utility libraries that provide various functional programming helpers. They are designed to simplify common tasks, such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and object manipulation.

In this benchmark, both libraries are used for their `isEqual` function, which checks if two values are equal.

**Special JS Feature/ Syntax**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark code. The focus is on comparing different approaches to equality checking.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative implementations of string equality checks, here are a few options:

1. **Built-in String.prototype.equals()**: Some browsers and Node.js versions have implemented `String.prototype.equals()` method, which can be used to compare strings.
2. **Intl.NumberFormat.compare**: This is an internationalized comparison function that can be used to compare strings in a culturally aware manner.
3. **Simple string comparison using == or !==**: While not as efficient as the other options, simple string comparison using `==` or `!==` can still work for most cases.

These alternatives may have different pros and cons compared to the benchmarked implementations.

Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `underscore vs lodash vs eq`

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

underscore

lodash

eq

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: underscore vs lodash vs eq

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

underscore

lodash

eq

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `underscore vs lodash vs eq`