Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
filter vs reduce
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
filter vs reduce
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
var data = { ...Array.from(Array(10000).keys()) };
Tests:
filter
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(data || {}).filter((d) => d[1]));
reduce
Object.entries(data).reduce( (acc, [key, value]) => value === undefined ? acc : { ...acc, [key]: value }, {} );
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
filter
reduce
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/132.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 132 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
filter
689.5 Ops/sec
reduce
26.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Object.fromEntries x reduce (correctly using fromEntries)
Hello_12312313
Object.fromEntries vs reduce 100000
Object filter: fromEntries vs reduce
Object filter: fromEntries vs reduce (with keys & entries)
Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs for of #1000
Object.fromEntries vs reduce for filtering keys
reduce object vs object.fromentries (1K records)
reduce vs fromEntries
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?