Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
reduce vs fromEntries
(version: 1)
reduce vs fromEntries
Comparing performance of:
Object.fromEntries vs Object.reduce
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
const ids = Array.from(Array(1000).keys()); var data = { ...Array.from(Array(10000).keys()) };
Tests:
Object.fromEntries
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(data).filter(([id]) => ids.includes(id)));
Object.reduce
Object.keys(data) .filter((id) => !ids.includes(id)) .reduce((acc, id) => ({...acc, [id]: data[id]}), {})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.fromEntries
Object.reduce
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
7 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Object.fromEntries
178.0 Ops/sec
Object.reduce
0.3 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Object.fromEntries vs reduce 341235
Object.fromEntries x reduce
Object.fromEntries x reduce (correctly using fromEntries)
Object.fromEntries vs reduce 100000
Object.fromEntries vs reduce test 2
Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs for of #1000
Object.fromEntries vs reduce for filtering keys
Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs classic for2
Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs classic for v3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?