Set.has vs Array.includes for small number of items (fixed) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: array_1 vs set_1 vs array_2 vs set_2 vs array_4 vs set_4 vs array_8 vs set_8

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    array_1
    set_1
    array_2
    set_2
    array_4
    set_4
    array_8
    set_8

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Android 11; Mobile; rv:136.0) Gecko/136.0 Firefox/136.0
Firefox Mobile 136 on Android
View result in a separate tab
set_1
535.9M/s
set_2
535.0M/s
set_8
533.2M/s
set_4
530.5M/s
array_1
20.4M/s
array_2
20.0M/s
array_4
19.3M/s
array_8
18.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ set_1 535,945,088 Ops/sec
set_2 535,038,176 Ops/sec
set_8 533,195,424 Ops/sec
set_4 530,497,504 Ops/sec
array_1 20,402,522 Ops/sec
array_2 20,027,638 Ops/sec
array_4 19,272,594 Ops/sec
array_8 18,608,556 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks