Benchmark: Math.min vs Array.reduce

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

var data = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) data.push(Math.random());

Tests:

Math.min
Math.min(...data);
Array.reduce
data.reduce((min, cur) => min > cur ? cur : min, data[0]);

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 9 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 9 runs

Array.reduce

2.0M/s

Math.min

283K/s

Fastest: Array.reduce (7.0x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Array.reduce: 1,983,999 ops/sec
• Math.min: 283,402 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.min
Array.reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.6 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Math.min

452K/s

Array.reduce

233K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Math.min	451,582 Ops/sec
Array.reduce	232,596 Ops/sec

Math.min vs Array.reduce (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Math.min vs Array.reduce`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Math.min

Array.reduce

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 9 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 9 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Math.min vs Array.reduce (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Math.min vs Array.reduce

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Math.min

Array.reduce

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 9 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 9 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Math.min vs Array.reduce`