Benchmark: Math.max() vs Array.reduce.apply()

Script Preparation code:

var values = new Array(5000);

for (let i = 0; i < values.length; ++i) {
    values[i] = i % 20;
}

Tests:

Math.max
return Math.max.apply(null, values);
Reduce
return values.reduce((prev, curr) => prev > curr ? prev : curr , 0);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.max
Reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 144 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Reduce

71K/s

Math.max

70K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Reduce	70,725 Ops/sec
Math.max	69,761 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested on it, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark compares the speed of two approaches: `Math.max()` vs `Array.reduce()`. The test is designed to measure the performance difference between these two methods when applied to an array of values.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code generates a large array (`values`) with 5000 elements, where each element is calculated as the remainder of its index divided by 20. This ensures that the array contains a diverse range of values, making it more representative for benchmarking purposes.

**Html Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code provided, which suggests that this benchmark focuses solely on JavaScript performance and does not take into account other factors like rendering or layout.

**Test Cases**

The test cases consist of two individual benchmarks:

1. `Math.max()`: This benchmark uses the `Math.max()` function with the `apply()` method to find the maximum value in the `values` array.
2. `Reduce`: This benchmark uses the `reduce()` method to find the maximum value in the `values` array.

**Libraries**

There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the provided code. However, it's worth noting that the `Math.max()` function is a built-in JavaScript function, while the `reduce()` method is part of the Array prototype.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

The benchmark uses the following special JS features:

* The use of arrow functions (`=>`) in the `Reduce` test case.
* The `apply()` method in the `Math.max()` test case.

These features are not specific to this benchmark and are commonly used in JavaScript development.

**Other Alternatives**

To achieve similar results, other approaches could be explored:

1. Using `Math.max()` with a custom comparator function instead of `apply()`.
2. Implementing a custom sorting algorithm for the `values` array before applying `reduce()` or `Math.max()`.
3. Using a different data structure, such as an object or a Set, to find the maximum value.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

* `Math.max()` with `apply()`: Pros - straightforward implementation, good performance for small arrays. Cons - may not be suitable for large arrays due to the overhead of `apply()`.
* `Array.reduce()`: Pros - efficient for large arrays, can be easily parallelized. Cons - may require more code and setup compared to `Math.max()`.

Ultimately, the choice between these approaches depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.

**Benchmark Results**

The provided benchmark results show that:

* The `Reduce` test case has a higher execution rate (354077.03125 executions per second) compared to the `Math.max()` test case (103321.453125 executions per second).
* The results indicate that `Array.reduce()` is generally faster than `Math.max()` for this specific benchmark.

Keep in mind that these results may vary depending on the specific hardware, software configuration, and other factors.

Math.max() vs Array.reduce.apply() (version: 0)

Compare speed of Math.max() vs Array.reduce().

Comparing performance of: `Math.max vs Reduce`

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Math.max

Reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Math.max() vs Array.reduce.apply() (version: 0)

Compare speed of Math.max() vs Array.reduce().

Comparing performance of: Math.max vs Reduce

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Math.max

Reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Math.max vs Reduce`