Reading textContent vs. nodeValue (incl. optional chaining) [FIXED] (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Read textContent vs Read textContent (incl. optional chaining) vs Read nodeValue vs Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining)

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Read textContent
    Read textContent (incl. optional chaining)
    Read nodeValue
    Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining)

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/131.0.0.0
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining)
16.6M/s
Read nodeValue
15.1M/s
Read textContent
9.4M/s
Read textContent (incl. optional chaining)
7.0M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining) 16,555,946 Ops/sec
Read nodeValue 15,081,601 Ops/sec
Read textContent 9,351,426 Ops/sec
Read textContent (incl. optional chaining) 7,012,178 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks