Reading textContent vs. nodeValue (incl. optional chaining) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Read textContent vs Read textContent (incl. optional chaining) vs Read nodeValue vs Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining)

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Read textContent
    Read textContent (incl. optional chaining)
    Read nodeValue
    Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining)

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 130 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining)
109.1M/s
Read textContent (incl. optional chaining)
108.7M/s
Read textContent
0/s
Read nodeValue
0/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ Read nodeValue (incl. optional chaining) 109,070,080 Ops/sec
Read textContent (incl. optional chaining) 108,662,648 Ops/sec
Read textContent 0 Ops/sec
Read nodeValue 0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks