Classnames vs CLSX vs cx v2 (version: 0)

Compare CLSX vs Classnames vs an simpliest implementation of creating a template string

Comparing performance of: classnames vs clsx vs cx

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 10 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 10 runs
clsx
5.7M/s
classnames
3.9M/s
cx
2.5M/s

Fastest: clsx (2.3x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ clsx: 5,711,961 ops/sec
  • • classnames: 3,855,066 ops/sec
  • • cx: 2,492,808 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    classnames
    clsx
    cx

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 141 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
clsx
14.8M/s
classnames
6.3M/s
cx
3.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ clsx 14,844,247 Ops/sec
classnames 6,314,047 Ops/sec
cx 3,639,056 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks