Classnames vs CLSX vs cx (version: 0)

Compare CLSX vs Classnames vs an simpliest implementation of creating a template string

Comparing performance of: classnames vs clsx vs cx

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 33 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 33 runs
clsx
15.3M/s
classnames
6.0M/s
cx
3.2M/s

Fastest: clsx (4.8x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ clsx: 15,296,398 ops/sec
  • • classnames: 6,015,888 ops/sec
  • • cx: 3,156,146 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    classnames
    clsx
    cx

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 3 days ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/151.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/151.0.0.0
Chrome 151 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
clsx
21.7M/s
classnames
10.0M/s
cx
3.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ clsx 21,699,718 Ops/sec
classnames 9,965,592 Ops/sec
cx 3,751,614 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks