Benchmark: Classnames vs CLSX vs cx

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.2.6/index.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.1.1/dist/clsx.min.js'></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@emotion/css@11.13.4/dist/emotion-css.umd.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var c = { a: true, b: false, c: undefined, d: "lorem-ipsum" };

Tests:

classnames
let result = window.classNames(c)
clsx
let result = window.clsx(c)
cx
let result = window.emotion.cx(c)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
classnames
clsx
cx

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 16 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/147.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/147.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 147 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
classnames	17281570.0 Ops/sec
clsx	38288420.0 Ops/sec
cx	9547108.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Classnames vs CLSX vs cx (version: 0)

Compare CLSX vs Classnames vs an simpliest implementation of creating a template string

Comparing performance of: classnames vs clsx vs cx

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

classnames

clsx

cx

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A