Benchmark: trycatch-benchmark-sum

Tests:

trycatch inside
let sum = 0; for (let i =0; i < 10000; i++) { try { sum += i; } catch(e) {} }
baseline
let sum = 0; for (let i =0; i < 10000; i++) { sum += i; }
trycatch outside
let sum = 0; try { for (let i =0; i < 10000; i++) { sum += i; } } catch(e) {}

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
trycatch inside
baseline
trycatch outside

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 13; M2104K10AC Build/TP1A.220624.014; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/120.0.6099.193 Mobile Safari/537.36 Lark/7.29.4 LarkLocale/zh_CN ChannelName/Feishu TTWebView/1201130054425

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 120 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
trycatch inside	116896.6 Ops/sec
baseline	112936.4 Ops/sec
trycatch outside	122304.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

let vs const vs var 2
Test for / for each
var let test
for/for len
!!number vs (number !== 0)
IIFE vs regular code v2
test +0
Roop Performance: while vs for vs call myself
12132132132131243214124

trycatch-benchmark-sum (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: trycatch inside vs baseline vs trycatch outside

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

trycatch inside

baseline

trycatch outside

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A