Benchmark: test +0 - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

add i
let b = 0; for (let i = 0; i < 10_000_000; i++) { b += i; }
add i + 0
let b = 0; for (let i = 0; i < 10_000_000; i++) { b += i + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
add i
add i + 0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 128 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
add i	94.0 Ops/sec
add i + 0	94.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll do my best to explain the benchmark, its options, and alternatives in detail.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmarks aim to measure the performance of adding an integer value `i` to another constant value (initially set to 0) in a loop.

**Options Compared**

Two different approaches are compared:

1. **"add i"`**: This option adds the value `i` directly to the initial value `b` inside the loop.
2. **"add i + 0"`**: This option adds the sum of `i` and five zeros (`0`) to the initial value `b` inside the loop.

**Pros and Cons**

* **"add i"`**:
	+ Pros: Simplistic and easy to understand. It only requires a single arithmetic operation.
	+ Cons: The addition operation may not be optimized by the JavaScript engine, potentially leading to slower performance compared to other approaches.
* **"add i + 0"`**:
	+ Pros: Forces the JavaScript engine to perform an additional arithmetic operation (`+ 0`), which can lead to better optimization and faster performance. This is because `+ 0` is a constant expression that always evaluates to its operand, allowing for more aggressive optimizations.
	+ Cons: Adds unnecessary complexity due to the inclusion of zeros.

**Other Considerations**

* **Loop Unrolling**: Some JavaScript engines may apply loop unrolling techniques, which can improve performance by reducing the number of iterations. However, this is not explicitly tested in these benchmarks.
* **Cache Locality**: The order in which operations are performed within a loop can impact cache locality. Modern CPUs often use caching to improve performance, and the order of operations can affect how efficiently data is retrieved from memory.

**Library and Special JS Features**

Neither of these benchmarks uses any specific JavaScript library or features that would significantly alter their behavior. However, it's essential to note that some JavaScript engines may have inherent differences in optimization strategies due to the presence of certain features or libraries, such as:

* **Strict Mode**: Enabling strict mode can lead to different optimizations and performance characteristics.
* **ES6+ Features**: Modern JavaScript features like arrow functions, let and const declarations, and async/await can impact performance.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for measuring loop performance in JavaScript could include:

1. **Sizzle**: A CSS selector engine that also measures JavaScript performance under similar conditions.
2. **Benchmark.js**: A benchmarking library specifically designed for testing JavaScript performance.
3. **jsperf**: An older but still popular benchmarking tool for comparing JavaScript performance.

These alternatives offer different features and options, such as multi-threaded execution, custom event loop simulations, or support for specific JavaScript engines.

Related benchmarks:

test +0 (version: 3)

Comparing performance of: add i vs add i + 0

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

add i

add i + 0

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):