Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
more vs not equal
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
more vs equal to
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
more
var n = 0; while(true) { 1000000 > -1; n++; if(n==100000) break; }
equal to
var n = 0; while(true) { 1000000 !== -1; n++; if(n==100000) break; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
more
equal to
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data for MeasureThat.net, a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a single test case or microbenchmark. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. "more vs not equal" 2. "equal to" The first test case checks the performance difference between `>` (greater than) and `!=` (not equal to) operators. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, we have two options being compared: * `1000000 > -1` * `1000000 !== -1` Both expressions are used in a while loop that increments a counter (`n`) until it reaches 100,000. The difference between these two expressions is that the first one uses the strict greater than operator (`>`), while the second one uses the loose not equal to operator (`!=`). **Pros and Cons** Using `>`, we get: Pros: * Simplistic comparison * Less memory allocation overhead Cons: * May be optimized away by JavaScript engines (this is a known issue) * Can lead to unexpected behavior in certain edge cases On the other hand, using `!=`, we get: Pros: * More explicit and safer than using `>`. * Can prevent issues with integer overflow. Cons: * More expensive to compute * May have higher memory allocation overhead due to creating a temporary object for the comparison **Library Usage** There is no specific library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, MeasureThat.net uses a custom JavaScript engine that compiles and executes microbenchmarks on the client-side. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark uses `while (true)` loop, which is a common idiom in JavaScript for creating an infinite loop. There is no special syntax or feature used here; it's a straightforward while loop with a condition. **Other Alternatives** If you want to create similar benchmarks using different languages or frameworks, consider the following alternatives: * For C: Use `gcc` and compile a small benchmark program that compares `1000000 > -1` and `1000000 != -1`. * For Python: Write a simple script that uses the `>` operator versus the `!=` operator in a while loop. Measure the execution time using tools like `timeit`. * For other languages: Adapt the benchmark to your language of choice, comparing the performance of different operators and data types. Keep in mind that each language has its unique features and optimizations, so you may need to adjust your approach accordingly.
Related benchmarks:
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster2?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster? with object.is
Which equals operator (== with type coercion vs ===) is faster?
Which equals operator (== vs === vs Object.is) is faster?
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?