Benchmark: npm clone libv2 - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/clone@2.1.2'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
  jayson: {
    stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
    parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
  }
};

var myCopy = null;
var cloneLib = clone

Tests:

lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
npm clone lib
myCopy = cloneLib(MyObject)
structuredClone
myCopy = structuredClone(MyObject)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash cloneDeep
npm clone lib
structuredClone

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 124 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

npm clone lib

523K/s

lodash cloneDeep

481K/s

structuredClone

227K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ npm clone lib	523,471 Ops/sec
lodash cloneDeep	480,547 Ops/sec
structuredClone	226,881 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares three different approaches for creating a deep copy of an object in JavaScript:

1.  **npm clone lib**: This method uses the `clone` function from the `clone` library, which is available via npm.
2.  **lodash cloneDeep**: This method uses the `cloneDeep` function from the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for functional programming in JavaScript.
3.  **structuredClone**: This method is a built-in JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2020 (ES2020) that creates a deep copy of an object.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches on a sample input object `MyObject`. The input object has nested properties, including arrays and objects, which require deep copying to create a new copy.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

*   **npm clone lib**: This approach uses a dedicated library for cloning objects. It is likely to be efficient but may introduce additional overhead due to the library's functionality.
*   **lodash cloneDeep**: Lodash is a widely used utility library, and its `cloneDeep` function is designed to create deep copies of complex data structures. This approach is likely to be performant, as it leverages optimized implementation details within the Lodash library. However, it introduces an external dependency on the Lodash library.
*   **structuredClone**: As a built-in JavaScript feature, this approach does not introduce any external dependencies or libraries. It is optimized for performance and should provide good results out of the box.

**Library Descriptions:**

*   **Lodash Library**: The Lodash library is a comprehensive utility library that provides various functions for common programming tasks in JavaScript. Its `cloneDeep` function creates a deep copy of an object, handling nested arrays and objects correctly.
*   **Clone Library**: The Clone library is a dedicated library for cloning objects in JavaScript. It provides a lightweight implementation of deep copying, which may be more efficient than the Lodash `cloneDeep` function.

**Special JS Features or Syntax:**

*   **structuredClone**: This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2020 (ES2020) as a built-in method for creating deep copies of objects. It is supported by most modern browsers and Node.js versions.

**Other Considerations:**

*   The benchmark's performance results may vary depending on the specific use case, input data, and JavaScript runtime environment.
*   In addition to these three approaches, other methods like JSON.parse() + JSON.stringify() or for...of loops could be used to create deep copies of objects. However, these methods are not as efficient as the approaches presented in the benchmark.

**Alternatives:**

*   Other libraries that provide deep copying functionality include `deep-clone` and `copy-deep`.

npm clone libv2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `lodash cloneDeep vs npm clone lib vs structuredClone`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

lodash cloneDeep

npm clone lib

structuredClone

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

npm clone libv2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash cloneDeep vs npm clone lib vs structuredClone

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

lodash cloneDeep

npm clone lib

structuredClone

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `lodash cloneDeep vs npm clone lib vs structuredClone`