Benchmark: Lodash cloneDeep vs clone

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
  jayson: {
    stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
    parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
  }
};

var myCopy = null;

Tests:

Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Vanilla clone
function clone(obj) { const clone = Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)); Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).forEach(key => { Object.defineProperty(clone, key, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(obj, key)); }); return clone; } myCopy = clone(MyObject);

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 6 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 6 runs

Lodash cloneDeep

1.5M/s

Vanilla clone

815K/s

Fastest: Lodash cloneDeep (1.9x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Lodash cloneDeep: 1,512,139 ops/sec
• Vanilla clone: 815,215 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Vanilla clone

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 135 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Vanilla clone

4.1M/s

Lodash cloneDeep

1.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Vanilla clone	4,147,276 Ops/sec
Lodash cloneDeep	1,105,072 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to create a deep copy of an object: Lodash's `cloneDeep` function and a vanilla JavaScript implementation using `Object.create` and `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor`.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string processing, and object manipulation. In this benchmark, Lodash's `cloneDeep` function is used to create a deep copy of the input object.

**Test Case 1: Lodash cloneDeep**

The first test case uses the `cloneDeep` function from Lodash to create a deep copy of the input object `MyObject`. This approach relies on Lodash's implementation to handle the complexities of creating a deep copy, including handling nested objects and arrays.

Pros:

* Simplified implementation: The developer does not need to write custom logic for creating a deep copy.
* Efficient: Lodash's implementation is optimized for performance and can handle complex object structures efficiently.

Cons:

* Dependency on external library: The test case relies on the presence of Lodash in the environment, which may not always be guaranteed.
* Potential overhead: Depending on the version of Lodash used, there might be additional overhead due to its complexity and feature set.

**Test Case 2: Vanilla clone**

The second test case uses a vanilla JavaScript implementation to create a deep copy of the input object `MyObject`. This approach requires the developer to write custom logic for creating a deep copy, which can be more complex than using a library like Lodash.

Pros:

* No external dependencies: The test case does not rely on any external libraries, making it self-contained.
* Customizable: The developer can tailor the implementation to specific requirements or optimize it for performance.

Cons:

* More complex implementation: Creating a deep copy manually requires more effort and expertise.
* Potential errors: Without proper handling of edge cases, the vanilla implementation might introduce bugs or inefficiencies.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. The focus is on comparing the performance of two different approaches to creating a deep copy.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:

1. **JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())**: This method can be used to create a deep copy of an object. However, it's not recommended for complex objects or arrays with cycles.
2. **Array.prototype.slice() + Object.assign()**: For creating a shallow copy of an object, you can use `Array.prototype.slice()` to clone the object's array properties and then use `Object.assign()` to merge the cloned array with the original object.
3. **For...of loops and Array.prototype.forEach()**: You can also create a deep copy by iterating over the object's properties using `for...of` loops and `Array.prototype.forEach()`, but this approach is more verbose and less efficient than the other methods.

Keep in mind that each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.

Lodash cloneDeep vs clone (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Lodash cloneDeep vs Vanilla clone`

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash cloneDeep

Vanilla clone

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 6 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 6 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Lodash cloneDeep vs clone (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash cloneDeep vs Vanilla clone

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash cloneDeep

Vanilla clone

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 6 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 6 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash cloneDeep vs Vanilla clone`