Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
pop vs index for array
(version: 0)
Comparing pop method vs last index check for an array element
Comparing performance of:
pop check vs last-index check
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function popLast() { var arr = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; const element = arr.pop(); return element; } function indexLast() { var arr = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; const element = arr[arr.lenght - 1]; return element; }
Tests:
pop check
popLast();
last-index check
indexLast();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
pop check
last-index check
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 133 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
pop check
58603360.0 Ops/sec
last-index check
36346192.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and understand what's being tested in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches for accessing an element at the end of an array: the `pop` method and the last index check (`arr[arr.length - 1]`). **Options compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Pop method**: The `pop` method removes and returns the last element from the array. 2. **Last index check**: This approach accesses the last element by using the array's length property minus one. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **Pop method**: + Pros: Simple, efficient, and fast (since it doesn't require indexing). + Cons: Modifies the original array, which might be a problem if the array is used elsewhere in the code. * **Last index check**: + Pros: Non-destructive, allowing the original array to remain unchanged. + Cons: Requires accessing the `length` property of the array, which can be slower than the `pop` method. **Library and its purpose** In this benchmark, no external libraries are used. The script preparation code defines two functions (`popLast` and `indexLast`) that demonstrate the different approaches for accessing an element at the end of an array. **Special JS feature or syntax** None mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript arrays have undergone changes over time, such as with the introduction of `let`, `const`, and `arrow functions`. MeasureThat.net might be using a version of JavaScript that is older than some modern browsers. **Other alternatives** In theory, other approaches could be used to access an element at the end of an array: 1. Using `splice` or `concat`: Removing and re-indexing elements. 2. Accessing arrays by index directly (e.g., using a variable for the index). 3. Using other data structures, like linked lists or queues. However, these alternatives might not be as efficient or straightforward as the `pop` method or last index check in this specific benchmark. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in MeasureThat.net!
Related benchmarks:
pop vs. Index write performance
Array Slice vs Pop
get element from array = [0] vs pop()
pop() vs array.length - 1
Last element slice vs pop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?