Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
get element from array = [0] vs pop()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
var a = x[0] vs var a = x.pop()
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var x = [1,2,3]
Tests:
var a = x[0]
var a = x[0]
var a = x.pop()
var a = x.pop()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
var a = x[0]
var a = x.pop()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark and the pros and cons of different approaches. **What is being tested?** The test measures two ways to access an element at index 0 from an array `x`: 1. Using bracket notation (`x[0]`) 2. Using the `pop()` method **Options comparison:** Here's a brief overview of each approach: * **Bracket Notation (`x[0]`)**: + Pros: - Fast and efficient, as it directly accesses the array element. - Simple and widely supported in most browsers. + Cons: - May throw an error if `x` is not an array or if the index is out of bounds. * **Pop() Method (`x.pop()`)**: + Pros: - Removes the last element from the array, which can be useful for certain use cases. - Does not require explicit indexing. + Cons: - May be slower than bracket notation due to additional overhead. - Returns `undefined` instead of throwing an error if the index is out of bounds. **Other considerations:** In addition to these two approaches, other factors that might affect performance include: * Array size and structure (e.g., sparse arrays, large arrays) * Browser and JavaScript engine optimizations * Context in which the array is used (e.g., for loops, event listeners) **Library usage:** There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark code. However, if a library like `Lodash` or `Underscore.js` were used to access elements of an array, it would likely use bracket notation or similar techniques. **Special JavaScript feature or syntax:** None are mentioned in this specific benchmark. **Benchmark preparation code and individual test cases:** The script preparation code creates an array `x` with a single element `[1,2,3]`. The individual test cases access the first element of the array using either bracket notation (`x[0]`) or the `pop()` method. These test cases are likely designed to measure the performance difference between these two approaches. **Latest benchmark result:** The results show that Chrome 102 on a desktop device with Mac OS X 10.15.7 executed both test cases: * Bracket notation (`x[0]`): approximately 15647807 executions per second * `pop()` method: approximately 15157385 executions per second In this specific case, bracket notation seems to be slightly faster than the `pop()` method. However, it's essential to note that these results may vary depending on the specific use case and environment.
Related benchmarks:
JS Slice vs. Pop for last element
Array Slice vs Pop
JS Slice vs. Pop vs index for last element
Last element slice vs pop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?