Benchmark: lodash uniq vs set performance

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var input = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 2, 5, 0, 8];

Tests:

Set
var l = [...new Set(input)]; return l;
Array
return _.uniq(input);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Set
Array

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/129.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 129 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Array

4.3M/s

Set

2.5M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array	4,347,674 Ops/sec
Set	2,461,290 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to remove duplicates from an array: using the `Set` object and using the `uniq()` function from the Lodash library.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **Using the Set object**: This approach uses the `Set` object in JavaScript, which is a collection of unique values. It creates a new `Set` instance from the input array and returns its contents.
2. **Using the uniq() function from Lodash**: This approach uses the `uniq()` function from the Lodash library, which removes duplicates from an array.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Using the Set object**:
	+ Pros: Efficient use of memory, fast execution time, and a simple implementation.
	+ Cons: Requires JavaScript to support `Set` objects (introduced in ECMAScript 2015), may not be compatible with older browsers or environments.
* **Using the uniq() function from Lodash**:
	+ Pros: Widely supported by modern browsers and environments, easy to use, and provides additional functionality beyond just removing duplicates.
	+ Cons: Requires a library (Lodash) to be loaded, which can introduce overhead, and may not be as efficient as using `Set` objects.

**Library Used**

The `uniq()` function from Lodash is used in this benchmark. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a collection of functional programming helpers, including the `uniq()` function, which removes duplicate values from an array.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark. Both approaches use standard JavaScript features and do not rely on any advanced techniques or libraries beyond what is commonly available.

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to test other approaches for removing duplicates from arrays, you could consider using:

* `filter()` method: Remove duplicates by filtering out elements that are already present in the array.
* `reduce()``` method: Remove duplicates by reducing the array to its unique values.
* Using a custom implementation using loops and conditional statements.

Keep in mind that each of these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, dependencies on specific JavaScript versions or libraries, and trade-offs in terms of code complexity.

lodash uniq vs set performance (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Set vs Array`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Set

Array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

lodash uniq vs set performance (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Set vs Array

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Set

Array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Set vs Array`