Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs ES6 uniq
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash uniq vs native using Set
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var numbers = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,34,54,23];
Tests:
lodash uniq
_.uniq(numbers);
native using Set
[...new Set(numbers)]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash uniq
native using Set
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to remove duplicates from an array: 1. **Lodash uniq**: Using the `lodash` library, specifically the `uniq` function. 2. **Native using Set**: Utilizing JavaScript's built-in `Set` data structure. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition JSON consists of two parts: 1. **Script Preparation Code**: This code initializes an array `numbers` with 20 elements, including duplicates. 2. **Html Preparation Code**: This code includes a script tag that loads the `lodash.js` library (version 4.17.5). **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Lodash uniq** * The benchmark definition is: `_.uniq(numbers);` * This function uses the `lodash` library to remove duplicates from the array. 2. **Native using Set** * The benchmark definition is: `[...new Set(numbers)]` * This code converts the array to a set (which automatically removes duplicates) and then converts it back to an array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Lodash uniq**: * Pros: + Easy to use and understand. + Well-documented and widely used library. * Cons: + Adds additional overhead due to the library's existence. + May not be optimized for performance. 2. **Native using Set**: * Pros: + No external library dependencies, reducing overhead. + Can be more efficient since it leverages JavaScript's built-in data structure. * Cons: + Requires a basic understanding of set operations and array conversion. + May not be suitable for large datasets or complex scenarios. **Library (Lodash) and its Purpose** The `lodash` library is a utility library that provides various functions for tasks like string manipulation, array manipulation, and more. In this case, the `uniq` function is used to remove duplicates from an array. Lodash is designed to make common tasks easier and more efficient. **Special JavaScript Feature or Syntax (None)** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test other approaches, you could consider: * Using a different library or framework for array manipulation. * Implementing your own duplicate-removal algorithm. * Comparing the performance of different data structures (e.g., `Map`, `WeakSet`, etc.) for removing duplicates. Note that these alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark definition and test cases.
Related benchmarks:
uniqBy performance
uniqBy performance ttt
uniqBy performance lodash vs native
uniqBy performance and map
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?