Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Create Date
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
New vs Reuse
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var start = new Date(); var temp1 = new Date();
Tests:
New
var new1 = new Date(start) new1.setHours(0,0,0,0); new1 = new1.getTime();
Reuse
temp1.setTime(start); temp1.setHours(0,0,0,0); var new1 = temp1.getTime();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
New
Reuse
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark measures the performance of two approaches for creating and setting the current date in JavaScript: creating a new Date object (`New`) and reusing an existing Date object (`Reuse`). **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Creating a new Date object**: This approach creates a new Date object every time it is needed, using the `new Date()` constructor. 2. **Reusing an existing Date object**: This approach creates a single Date object and reuses it for multiple executions. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **New (Creating a new Date object)** Pros: * Easy to implement * No need to store or manage the Date object Cons: * Creates a new Date object every time, which can lead to performance overhead due to object creation and garbage collection. * May not be efficient for repeated executions. **Reuse (Reusing an existing Date object)** Pros: * Reduces performance overhead due to object creation and garbage collection. * Can improve performance for repeated executions. Cons: * Requires storing and managing the Date object, which can add complexity. * May require additional memory allocation. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's likely that some JavaScript libraries (e.g., Lodash) might be used indirectly through the `Date` constructor, but this is not explicitly stated. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses the `getTime()` method to get the timestamp of a Date object in milliseconds. This method is a standard part of the JavaScript API and does not require any special features or syntax. **Other Alternatives** If you want to create a similar benchmark, here are some alternatives: 1. CreateDate(): You can use the `createDate` function from the `date-fns` library to compare performance between creating a new Date object using this function versus the `new Date()` constructor. 2. Moment.js: If you're interested in comparing performance with a popular date and time library, you can create a benchmark that uses Moment.js instead of JavaScript's built-in Date API. 3. Custom implementation: You could also implement custom functions for creating and manipulating Dates to compare performance. Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on your goals, requirements, and target audience for the benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Create Date
Create Date
Create Date
Create Date
instanceof vs regular comparison
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?