Benchmark: pow2 vs sqrt - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var numbers = Array.from(Array(10000), (_,x) => (Math.random()*x));

Tests:

sqrt
numbers.forEach(x => Math.sqrt(x));
pow 2
numbers.forEach(x => Math.pow(x,2.0));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
sqrt
pow 2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:123.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/123.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 123 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
sqrt	20285.1 Ops/sec
pow 2	20302.3 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that provides metadata about the test case. In this case, there are two test cases:

1. "pow2 vs sqrt"
2. "sqrt"

The description field is empty, which means no additional information is provided about the benchmark.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is used to generate data for the test case. In this case, it creates an array of 10,000 random numbers using `Array.from` and `Math.random`.

**Html Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code, which means that the benchmark only focuses on JavaScript performance.

**Individual Test Cases**

The individual test cases are:

1. "sqrt"
	* Benchmark Definition: `numbers.forEach(x => Math.sqrt(x));`
	* Test Name: "sqrt"

This test case measures the performance of calculating the square root of a large number array using the `Math.sqrt` function.

2. "pow 2"
	* Benchmark Definition: `numbers.forEach(x => Math.pow(x,2.0));`
	* Test Name: "pow 2"

This test case measures the performance of calculating the square of a large number array using the `Math.pow` function with exponentiation to avoid integer overflow.

**Library Usage**

There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition or script preparation code. However, it's likely that the JavaScript engine being tested (e.g., SpiderMonkey in Firefox) provides some optimized implementations of these functions.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition or script preparation code. The tests only use standard JavaScript functions and data types.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

Here's a brief summary:

1. **`Math.sqrt(x)`**:
	* Pros: Simple, widely available implementation.
	* Cons: May be slower than custom implementation due to overhead from the `sqrt` function call.
2. **`Math.pow(x, 2.0)`**:
	* Pros: Avoids integer overflow and provides a more accurate result for large numbers.
	* Cons: Can be slower than the simple square root implementation.

In general, using the optimized implementations provided by JavaScript engines can lead to better performance. However, if you have specific requirements or constraints, custom implementations might be necessary.

**Other Alternatives**

Some other alternatives that could be used to benchmark similar operations include:

1. **`BigInt`**: For large integers, `BigInt` provides a more efficient and accurate way to perform arithmetic operations.
2. **`Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)`**: For numerical computations involving complex numbers or large arrays, FFT can provide significant performance improvements.

However, for simple cases like calculating square roots or squares of numbers, the optimized implementations provided by JavaScript engines are likely to be sufficient.

Related benchmarks:

pow2 vs sqrt (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: sqrt vs pow 2

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

sqrt

pow 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):