Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Compare !array.length vs array.length === 0
(version: 0)
Compare both ways of test an empty array
Comparing performance of:
!array.length vs arr.length === 0
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [];
Tests:
!array.length
if (!arr.length) { console.log(1); } else { console.log(0); }
arr.length === 0
if (arr.length === 0) { console.log(1); } else { console.log(0); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
!array.length
arr.length === 0
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/132.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 132 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
!array.length
155163.9 Ops/sec
arr.length === 0
157398.7 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and benchmark preparation code to understand what is being tested. **What is being tested?** The test is comparing two ways of testing an empty array: 1. `!array.length` (using the negation operator) 2. `array.length === 0` (using a direct comparison with zero) In essence, the test is checking which approach is faster and more efficient. **Options compared:** * Negation operator (`!`) vs direct comparison with zero (`===`) * Two different syntaxes for testing an empty array **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Negation operator (`!`)**: * Pros: Simple, concise, and easy to read. * Cons: May be slower due to the extra operation required to negate the value. In modern JavaScript engines, this difference is likely negligible, but it's still a consideration. 2. **Direct comparison with zero (`===`)**: * Pros: Faster in some cases (e.g., when using the `===` operator for equality checks), as it can take advantage of the browser's optimization for direct comparisons. * Cons: May be more verbose and harder to read than the negation operator. **Library and special JS feature used:** None are mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, some libraries or frameworks might use these syntaxes differently or provide alternative ways of testing empty arrays. **Special JS feature explained (if applicable):** In modern JavaScript, the `===` operator is used for strict equality comparisons. This means that it will perform a type check before comparing values, which can be beneficial in certain situations. The negation operator (`!`) is often used to simplify conditional statements and avoid repetition. **Other alternatives:** For testing empty arrays, other approaches could include: * Using the `isEmpty()` method provided by some libraries or frameworks. * Checking if an array has at least one element using `array.length > 0`. * Using a library like Lodash's `isEmpty` function. However, these alternatives might not be relevant to this specific benchmark, as it focuses on comparing two simple syntaxes for testing empty arrays.
Related benchmarks:
JS array emptiness check
array.splice vs array.length
check if array is empty or not using length and at method
array.length vs array.length > 0 without console.log
array.length = 0 vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?