Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JS array emptiness check
(version: 0)
Comparing the performance of array.length and typeof array[0] === "undefined"
Comparing performance of:
typeof vs array.length
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [];
Tests:
typeof
typeof arr[0] === "undefined";
array.length
arr.length;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
typeof
array.length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two different ways to check if an array is empty: 1. `typeof arr[0] === "undefined"`: This method checks the type of the first element in the array using the `typeof` operator. If the array is empty, the expression will evaluate to `"undefined"`. 2. `arr.length`: This method returns the length of the array directly. **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches: * Option 1: Using `typeof arr[0] === "undefined"` (denoted as "typeof") * Option 2: Using `arr.length` (denoted as "array.length") **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Option 1 (typeof)**: + Pros: This method is concise and easy to read. It's also a common pattern in JavaScript. + Cons: This method has a higher overhead due to the type checking, which can lead to slower performance for large arrays. * **Option 2 (arr.length)**: + Pros: This method is simple and straightforward. It directly returns the length of the array without any additional checks. + Cons: This method may not be as readable or concise as `typeof arr[0] === "undefined"`. **Library Used** None explicitly mentioned, but we can infer that the benchmark uses the standard JavaScript built-in methods for checking array emptiness. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The `typeof` operator is used here, which checks the data type of a value. In this case, it's used to check if an element in the array is `"undefined"`, indicating an empty array. **Other Alternatives** In addition to these two options, there are other ways to check for an empty array: * `arr.every((element) => element === undefined);` (using a more explicit loop) * `arr.some((element) => element === undefined);` (using a more explicit loop) * Using the `isEmpty()` method provided by some JavaScript libraries or frameworks * Using a library like Lodash's `isEmpty()` function These alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs in terms of readability and maintainability. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The script preparation code `var arr = [];` creates an empty array to be used for the benchmark. The HTML preparation code is null, indicating that no additional HTML elements are needed to run the benchmark. Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and straightforward way to compare the performance of two different approaches to checking if an array is empty in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
array.splice vs array.length
var is a non-empty array (v2)
check if array is empty or not using length and at method
array.length = 0 vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?