Benchmark: hello amila 2 - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

jsDate = new Date()

dtf = new Intl.DateTimeFormat("en-US", {
	hour12: false,
	timeZone: "America/New_York",
	year: "numeric",
	month: "2-digit",
	day: "2-digit",
	hour: "2-digit",
	minute: "2-digit",
	second: "2-digit",
	era: "short",
})

// from luxon
function hackyOffset(dtf, date) {
	const formatted = dtf.format(date).replace(/\u200E/g, ""),
		parsed = /(\d+)\/(\d+)\/(\d+) (AD|BC),? (\d+):(\d+):(\d+)/.exec(formatted),
		[, fMonth, fDay, fYear, fadOrBc, fHour, fMinute, fSecond] = parsed ?? []
	return [fYear, fMonth, fDay, fadOrBc, fHour, fMinute, fSecond]
}

const typeToPos = {
	year: 0,
	month: 1,
	day: 2,
	era: 3,
	hour: 4,
	minute: 5,
	second: 6,
}

function partsOffset(dtf, date) {
	const formatted = dtf.formatToParts(date)
	const filled = new Array(7);
	for (let i = 0; i < formatted.length; i++) {
		const { type, value } = formatted[i]
		const pos = typeToPos[type]

		if (type === "era") {
			filled[pos] = value
		} else if (pos !== undefined) {
			filled[pos] = parseInt(value, 10)
		}
	}
	return filled
}

Tests:

hackyOffset
hackyOffset(dtf, jsDate)
partsOffset
partsOffset(dtf, jsDate)
dtf.formatToParts
dtf.formatToParts(jsDate)
dtf.format
dtf.format(jsDate)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
hackyOffset
partsOffset
dtf.formatToParts
dtf.format

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.2.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 17 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

dtf.format

532K/s

hackyOffset

485K/s

dtf.formatToParts

393K/s

partsOffset

240K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ dtf.format	531,905 Ops/sec
hackyOffset	484,504 Ops/sec
dtf.formatToParts	392,994 Ops/sec
partsOffset	240,428 Ops/sec

hello amila 2 (version: 1) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `hackyOffset vs partsOffset vs dtf.formatToParts vs dtf.format`

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

hackyOffset

partsOffset

dtf.formatToParts

dtf.format

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

hello amila 2 (version: 1) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: hackyOffset vs partsOffset vs dtf.formatToParts vs dtf.format

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

hackyOffset

partsOffset

dtf.formatToParts

dtf.format

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `hackyOffset vs partsOffset vs dtf.formatToParts vs dtf.format`