Benchmark: dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (calculating)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.9/dayjs.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.4.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@js-joda/core@5.5.3/dist/js-joda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.9.0/date_fns.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var dayjsDate1 = dayjs('2022-09-01T00:00:00+09:00');
var dayjsDate2 = dayjs('2023-09-01T00:00:00+09:00');
var luxonDate1 = luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2022-09-01T00:00:00+09:00");
var luxonDate2 = luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2023-09-01T00:00:00+09:00");
var jsJodaDate1 = JSJoda.ZonedDateTime.parse('2022-09-01T00:00:00+09:00', JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_OFFSET_DATE_TIME);
var jsJodaDate2 = JSJoda.ZonedDateTime.parse('2023-09-01T00:00:00+09:00', JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_OFFSET_DATE_TIME);
var date1 = new Date('2022-09-01T00:00:00+09:00');
var date2 = new Date('2023-09-01T00:00:00+09:00');

Tests:

Dayjs
dayjsDate2.diff(dayjsDate1, 'month');
luxon
luxonDate2.diff(luxonDate1, 'months');
js-joda
jsJodaDate1.until(jsJodaDate2, JSJoda.ChronoUnit.MONTHS);
date-fns
dateFns.differenceInMonths(date2, date1);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Dayjs
luxon
js-joda
date-fns

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 125 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

js-joda

1.9M/s

date-fns

479K/s

luxon

144K/s

Dayjs

48K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ js-joda	1,896,737 Ops/sec
date-fns	478,868 Ops/sec
luxon	144,257 Ops/sec
Dayjs	48,132 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark compares four date manipulation libraries: dayjs, luxon, js-joda, and date-fns. The benchmark focuses on calculating the difference between two dates in different units (months).

**Library Description**

1. **Dayjs**: A popular library for working with dates and times in JavaScript. It provides a simple and intuitive API for various date-related tasks.
2. **Luxon**: A modern JavaScript date and time library that offers a robust feature set, including support for various date formats, time zones, and cultural calendars.
3. **Js-joda**: A Java-based library adapted to JavaScript, providing a comprehensive set of features for working with dates and times, including zone-aware calculations.
4. **Date-fns**: A small and lightweight library that provides a simple API for common date and time operations.

**Comparison Options**

The benchmark compares the performance of each library when calculating the difference between two dates in different units:

* Dayjs: `diff` function with `'month'` unit
* Luxon: `diff` function with `'months'` unit
* Js-joda: `until` function with `JSJoda.ChronoUnit.MONTHS` value
* Date-fns: `differenceInMonths` function

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each library:

1. **Dayjs**:
	* Pros: Simple API, fast execution, widely supported.
	* Cons: Limited feature set compared to other libraries.
2. **Luxon**:
	* Pros: Robust feature set, flexible date formats, time zones support.
	* Cons: Steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature.
3. **Js-joda**:
	* Pros: Comprehensive feature set, zone-aware calculations, Java-like API.
	* Cons: Adapting a Java-based library to JavaScript can be challenging.
4. **Date-fns**:
	* Pros: Lightweight, simple API, fast execution.
	* Cons: Limited feature set compared to other libraries.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None of the libraries in this benchmark use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard ECMAScript 2020 syntax.

**Benchmark Results**

The latest benchmark results show that:

1. Js-joda has the highest executions per second (1896737.125).
2. Date-fns is close behind with a relatively high execution rate (48131.78125).
3. Luxon and Dayjs have lower execution rates, but still offer competitive performance.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative libraries to these four options, consider:

1. **Moment.js**: A popular library for working with dates and times in JavaScript.
2. **Date picker libraries**: Such as DateRangePicker or FullCalendar, which provide more comprehensive date management features.
3. **Custom implementations**: Using standard ECMAScript 2020 functions like `Date`, `getTime()`.

Keep in mind that the choice of library depends on your specific project requirements and personal preferences.

dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (calculating) (version: 5)

Comparing performance of: `Dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns`

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Dayjs

luxon

js-joda

date-fns

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (calculating) (version: 5)

Comparing performance of: Dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Dayjs

luxon

js-joda

date-fns

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns`