Benchmark: dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (manipulating)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.11.9/dayjs.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.4.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@js-joda/core@5.5.3/dist/js-joda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.9.0/date_fns.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var dayjsNow = dayjs();
var luxonNow = luxon.DateTime.now();
var jsJodaNow = JSJoda.ZonedDateTime.now();
var now = new Date();

Tests:

Dayjs
dayjsNow.add(1, 'month');
luxon
luxonNow.plus({ months: 1 });
js-joda
jsJodaNow.plusMonths(1);
date-fns
dateFns.addMonths(now, 1);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Dayjs
luxon
js-joda
date-fns

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.0.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Dayjs	897627.6 Ops/sec
luxon	760246.7 Ops/sec
js-joda	4701460.5 Ops/sec
date-fns	5897008.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns (manipulating) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Dayjs vs luxon vs js-joda vs date-fns

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Dayjs

luxon

js-joda

date-fns

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A