Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Exponentiation vs Math.pow test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Exponentiation vs Math.pow
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
Exponentiation
let n = 50; let total = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { let y = n ** 7; total += y; } console.log(total);
Math.pow
let n = 50; let total = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { let y = Math.pow(n, 7); total += y; } console.log(total);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Exponentiation
Math.pow
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Android 14; Mobile; rv:121.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/121.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox Mobile 121 on Android
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=495147" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Math.pow
72K/s
Exponentiation
70K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Math.pow
72,038 Ops/sec
Exponentiation
69,922 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Description:** The test is comparing the performance of two approaches to calculate `n` raised to the power of 7: 1. **Exponentiation (`**` operator)**: This uses the exponentiation operator, which is a built-in operator in JavaScript that calculates the value of `a` raised to the power of `b`. 2. **Math.pow() function**: This uses the `Math.pow()` function from the Math library, which also calculates the value of `a` raised to the power of `b`. **Options Compared:** The test is comparing the two approaches: * **Exponentiation (`**` operator)** vs **Math.pow() function** **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** * **Exponentiation (`**` operator)`**: + Pros: - Typically faster than using `Math.pow()` due to its optimized implementation. - More concise code, making it easier to read and write. + Cons: - May not be as flexible or customizable as using `Math.pow()`. * **Math.pow() function**: + Pros: - Highly customizable, allowing for more control over the calculation (e.g., rounding errors). - Can be useful when working with non-integer exponents or when specific rounding rules are required. + Cons: - Typically slower than exponentiation due to its overhead and implementation details. **Other Considerations:** * **Library Usage:** Neither approach uses a third-party library, making the test more focused on JavaScript's built-in capabilities. * **Special JS Features/Syntax:** Neither approach relies on any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond basic arithmetic operations.
Related benchmarks
Math.pow() vs exponentiation operator
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication pow 4
math.pow vs multiply vs exponentiation
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?