Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication pow 4
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var n = 1.234567;
Tests:
Math.pow
var x = Math.pow(n, 4);
Exponentiation
var y = n ** 4;
Multiplication
var y = n * n * n * n;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math.pow
Exponentiation
Multiplication
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 138 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=604406" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Multiplication
1574.1M/s
Math.pow
1573.1M/s
Exponentiation
1564.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Multiplication
1,574,140,032 Ops/sec
Math.pow
1,573,069,952 Ops/sec
Exponentiation
1,564,941,568 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining the provided JSON and benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the test case being run. It includes: * **Name**: The name of the benchmark, which in this case is "Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication pow 4". * **Description**: An optional description of the benchmark. * **Script Preparation Code**: A JavaScript code snippet that sets up a variable `n` with the value `1.234567`. * **Html Preparation Code**: An optional HTML code snippet, which is empty in this case. This script preparation code is used to set up a test environment for the benchmark, allowing it to execute consistently and accurately across different test runs. **Individual Test Cases** The individual test cases are an array of objects, each representing a separate test run. Each object contains: * **Benchmark Definition**: A JavaScript code snippet that defines the specific operation being tested (e.g., `var x = Math.pow(n, 4);`). * **Test Name**: The name of the test case, which corresponds to one of the three operations being compared: "Math.pow", "Exponentiation", or "Multiplication". The main difference between these test cases is how the exponentiation operation is expressed: * `var x = Math.pow(n, 4);`: Uses the built-in `Math.pow` function. * `var y = n ** 4;`: Uses the **optional** **Symbol** operator (`**`) for exponentiation. This syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and allows for more concise and expressive way to perform exponentiation. * `var y = n * n * n * n;`: Performs multiplication instead of exponentiation. **Pros and Cons** * **Math.pow**: The built-in function is widely supported across different browsers, but it can be slower than the other two options due to its more complex implementation. Additionally, using a function call might incur a slight performance overhead. * **Exponentiation (`**`)**: This syntax is part of ES6 and provides a concise way to express exponentiation. However, it may not be supported in older browsers or JavaScript environments that don't have ES6 support. There might also be some minor performance differences due to the syntax difference. The key point here is that we're comparing different ways of performing the same operation (exponentiation). We're not considering alternative mathematical libraries or algorithms for this comparison, but rather how the language provides built-in functions and shorthand notation for exponentiation. **Other Alternatives** Some additional alternatives could have been considered: * Using a third-party library like MathJS to perform exponentiation. * Implementing an exponential algorithm using bit manipulation or other optimization techniques. * Comparing different implementation strategies, such as using a polynomial or lookup table for faster computation. However, these alternatives were not explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition and individual test cases. **Device Platform** The benchmark was run on a **Desktop** device platform (Windows) with Chrome 112 browser. This information is used to filter out any non-Dominant execution data from other platforms or browsers. In summary, this benchmark compares three different ways to perform exponentiation in JavaScript: using the built-in `Math.pow` function, the new `Symbol` operator (`**`) for exponentiation, and simple multiplication. The results provide insight into the relative performance of these approaches across various devices and browsers.
Related benchmarks
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication
multiplication vs exponentiation
math.pow vs multiply vs exponentiation
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?