Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance 1

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world', moreData: 'here we go' } const secondObject = { sampleData: 'foo bar', moreData: 'here we go2' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world', moreData: 'here we go' } const secondObject = { sampleData: 'foo bar', moreData: 'here we go2' } const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, along with the pros and cons of each approach.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two methods: using the spread operator (`...`) to merge objects and `Object.assign()` to achieve the same result.

**Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Using the Spread Operator**: This test case uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new object that combines the properties of two existing objects, `firstObject` and `secondObject`. The resulting object is assigned to the `finalObject` variable.
2. **Using Object.assign()**: This test case uses the `Object.assign()` method to merge the properties of two objects, `firstObject` and `secondObject`, into a new object, which is then assigned to the `finalObject` variable.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ More readable and concise syntax.
		+ Creates a new object that can be easily modified or extended without affecting the original objects.
	* Cons:
		+ May have slightly higher performance overhead due to the creation of a new array-like object.
2. **Object.assign()**:
	* Pros:
		+ More efficient in terms of performance, as it only copies references to existing properties rather than creating new ones.
		+ Can be used with arrays and other complex data structures.
	* Cons:
		+ Less readable and more verbose syntax.
		+ Returns a new object, which may not be desirable if the intention is to modify an existing object.

**Library/Functionality Used**

In this benchmark, `Object.assign()` is used as a built-in JavaScript method. It's part of the ECMAScript standard and has been supported by most modern browsers for several versions.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

The use of the spread operator (`...`) is a relatively recent feature in JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES10). It allows for more concise and expressive syntax when merging objects or arrays. This feature is widely supported across modern browsers, including Safari 17.

**Other Alternatives**

Besides using the spread operator and `Object.assign()`, there are other methods to merge objects, such as:

* Using a library like Lodash's `merge()` function.
* Creating an object by iterating over the properties of two objects and assigning them to the resulting object.
* Using a function that takes two objects as arguments and returns a new object with merged properties.

However, these alternatives might not be as performance-efficient or concise as using the spread operator and `Object.assign()`.

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance 1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Object.assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):