Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs fast-deep-equal vs JSON.stringify
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function equal(a, b) { if (a === b) return true; if (a && b && typeof a == 'object' && typeof b == 'object') { if (a.constructor !== b.constructor) return false; var length, i, keys; if (Array.isArray(a)) { length = a.length; if (length != b.length) return false; for (i = length; i-- !== 0;) if (!equal(a[i], b[i])) return false; return true; } if (a.constructor === RegExp) return a.source === b.source && a.flags === b.flags; if (a.valueOf !== Object.prototype.valueOf) return a.valueOf() === b.valueOf(); if (a.toString !== Object.prototype.toString) return a.toString() === b.toString(); keys = Object.keys(a); length = keys.length; if (length !== Object.keys(b).length) return false; for (i = length; i-- !== 0;) if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(b, keys[i])) return false; for (i = length; i-- !== 0;) { var key = keys[i]; if (!equal(a[key], b[key])) return false; } return true; } // true if both NaN, false otherwise return a!==a && b!==b; }; function jsonEqual(a, b) { return JSON.stringify(a) === JSON.stringify(b); } // 1 level deep var data = [ { description: 'equal numbers', value1: 1, value2: 1, equal: true, }, { description: 'not equal numbers', value1: 1, value2: 2, equal: false, }, { description: 'number and array are not equal', value1: 1, value2: [], equal: false, }, { description: '0 and null are not equal', value1: 0, value2: null, equal: false, }, { description: 'equal strings', value1: 'a', value2: 'a', equal: true, }, { description: 'big object', value1: { prop1: 'value1', prop2: 'value2', prop3: 'value3', prop4: { subProp1: 'sub value1', subProp2: { subSubProp1: 'sub sub value1', subSubProp2: [ 1, 2, { prop2: 1, prop: 2 }, 4, 5, ], }, }, prop5: 1000, prop6: new Date(2016, 2, 10), }, value2: { prop5: 1000, prop3: 'value3', prop1: 'value1', prop2: 'value2', prop6: new Date('2016/03/10'), prop4: { subProp2: { subSubProp1: 'sub sub value1', subSubProp2: [ 1, 2, { prop2: 1, prop: 2 }, 4, 5, ], }, subProp1: 'sub value1', }, }, equal: true, }, ];
Tests:
lodash
data.forEach((item) => { _.isEqual(item.value1, item.value2); });
fast-deep-equal
data.forEach((item) => { equal(item.value1, item.value2); });
JSON.stringify
data.forEach((item) => { jsonEqual(item.value1, item.value2); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
fast-deep-equal
JSON.stringify
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON defines a benchmark named `lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal 2`. The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two functions: `lodash.isEqual` and `fast-deep-equal`. Both functions are used to check if two values are equal. The benchmark consists of three test cases: 1. **lodash**: This test case uses the `_.isEqual` function from the Lodash library to check if two values in an array are equal. 2. **fast-deep-equal**: This test case uses the `fast-deep-equal` function to check if two values in an array are equal. 3. **JSON.stringify**: This test case uses the `jsonEqual` function to check if two JSON strings are equal. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches: 1. **Lodash isEqual**: This approach uses the `_.isEqual` function from Lodash, which recursively checks if two values are equal. 2. **Fast-Deep-Equal**: This approach uses the `fast-deep-equal` function, which is optimized for deep equality comparisons. 3. **JSON.stringify**: This approach uses a simple string comparison to check if two JSON strings are equal. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Lodash isEqual**: * Pros: Widely used, well-maintained library with robust tests. * Cons: Can be slow for large datasets due to recursive checks. 2. **Fast-Deep-Equal**: * Pros: Optimized for deep equality comparisons, can handle large datasets efficiently. * Cons: May not work correctly for all data types (e.g., non-JSON strings). 3. **JSON.stringify**: * Pros: Simple and efficient string comparison. * Cons: May not be suitable for all use cases (e.g., when working with complex JSON objects). **Latest Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that: 1. **Lodash isEqual**: Performed poorly in this benchmark, with an average of 278,120 executions per second. 2. **Fast-Deep-Equal**: Performed well in this benchmark, with an average of 235,994 executions per second. 3. **JSON.stringify**: Performed the best in this benchmark, with an average of 449,383 executions per second. Overall, these results suggest that `fast-deep-equal` is a good choice for deep equality comparisons, while `JSON.stringify` can be used for simple string comparisons.
Related benchmarks:
fast compare test w/lodash 3
lodash deepEqual vs fast-deep-equal v2
lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal vs stable-hash-compare
lodash vs fast-equals vs fast-deep-equal
lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal vs local 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?