Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal vs local 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs fast-deep-equal vs deepEqual vs fast-equals deep equal
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/fast-equals@5.0.1"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function equal(a, b) { if (a === b) return true; if (a && b && typeof a == 'object' && typeof b == 'object') { if (a.constructor !== b.constructor) return false; var length, i, keys; if (Array.isArray(a)) { length = a.length; if (length != b.length) return false; for (i = length; i-- !== 0;) if (!equal(a[i], b[i])) return false; return true; } if (a.constructor === RegExp) return a.source === b.source && a.flags === b.flags; if (a.valueOf !== Object.prototype.valueOf) return a.valueOf() === b.valueOf(); if (a.toString !== Object.prototype.toString) return a.toString() === b.toString(); keys = Object.keys(a); length = keys.length; if (length !== Object.keys(b).length) return false; for (i = length; i-- !== 0;) if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(b, keys[i])) return false; for (i = length; i-- !== 0;) { var key = keys[i]; if (!equal(a[key], b[key])) return false; } return true; } // true if both NaN, false otherwise return a!==a && b!==b; }; // 1 level deep var data = [ { description: 'equal numbers', value1: 1, value2: 1, equal: true, }, { description: 'not equal numbers', value1: 1, value2: 2, equal: false, }, { description: 'number and array are not equal', value1: 1, value2: [], equal: false, }, { description: '0 and object are not equal', value1: 0, value2: {}, equal: false, }, { description: 'equal strings', value1: 'a', value2: 'a', equal: true, }, { description: 'big object', value1: { prop1: 'value1', prop2: 'value2', prop3: 'value3', prop4: { subProp1: 'sub value1', subProp2: { subSubProp1: 'sub sub value1', subSubProp2: [ 1, 2, { prop2: 1, prop: 2 }, 4, 5, ], }, }, prop5: 1000, prop6: new Date(2016, 2, 10), }, value2: { prop5: 1000, prop3: 'value3', prop1: 'value1', prop2: 'value2', prop6: new Date('2016/03/10'), prop4: { subProp2: { subSubProp1: 'sub sub value1', subSubProp2: [ 1, 2, { prop2: 1, prop: 2 }, 4, 5, ], }, subProp1: 'sub value1', }, }, equal: true, }, ];
Tests:
lodash
data.forEach((item) => { _.isEqual(item.value1, item.value2); });
fast-deep-equal
data.forEach((item) => { equal(item.value1, item.value2); });
deepEqual
function deepEqual(object1, object2) { const keys1 = Object.keys(object1); const keys2 = Object.keys(object2); if (keys1.length !== keys2.length) { return false; } for (const key of keys1) { const val1 = object1[key]; const val2 = object2[key]; const areObjects = isObject(val1) && isObject(val2); if ( areObjects && !deepEqual(val1, val2) || !areObjects && val1 !== val2 ) { return false; } } return true; } function isObject(object) { return object != null && typeof object === 'object'; } data.forEach((item) => { deepEqual(item.value1, item.value2); });
fast-equals deep equal
const dq = window["fast-equals"].deepEqual; data.forEach((item) => { dq(item.value1, item.value2); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
fast-deep-equal
deepEqual
fast-equals deep equal
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 132 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
lodash
664802.9 Ops/sec
fast-deep-equal
2543512.0 Ops/sec
deepEqual
1398552.5 Ops/sec
fast-equals deep equal
2641695.8 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
The test data appears to be for comparing the performance of three different libraries: `lodash`, `fast-equals`, and their own custom implementations (`deepEqual`). To determine which library is faster, I can compare the execution rates of each library across multiple runs. Based on the latest benchmark result provided, here are the results: 1. **Fast-Equal**: 428232 executions per second 2. **Lodash**: 89176 executions per second (slower than Fast-Equal by approximately 47 times) 3. **Deep Equal**: 57350 executions per second (slower than Fast-Equal by approximately 75 times) Conclusion: Fast-equals appears to be the fastest library among the three, followed closely by the custom `deepEqual` implementation. Lodash is significantly slower than the other two libraries. However, please note that this analysis is based on a single benchmark result and may not reflect the actual performance of these libraries in real-world scenarios or with different datasets.
Related benchmarks:
fast compare test w/lodash 3
lodash deepEqual vs fast-deep-equal v2
lodash.isEqual vs fast-deep-equal vs stable-hash-compare
lodash vs fast-equals vs fast-deep-equal
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?