Benchmark: JQuery version speed test

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
  	$("body").append($("<p></p>").text("Text."));
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).end().end().remove();
}

Tests:

$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**What is being tested?**

MeasureThat.net is testing the performance of jQuery versions 1.12.4, 2.2.4, and 3.3.1. The test cases focus on a single method call to `tests()` with each version of jQuery as an argument.

**Options compared:**

The benchmark compares three different versions of jQuery:

* **jQuery 1.12.4**: This is an older version of jQuery that was widely used in the past.
* **jQuery 2.2.4**: This version was released around 2013 and introduced some new features, but also had some performance improvements.
* **jQuery 3.3.1**: This is a more recent version of jQuery that has many performance optimizations, improved compatibility with modern browsers, and new features.

**Pros and Cons:**

Here are the pros and cons of each option:

* **jQuery 1.12.4**:
	+ Pros: Still widely supported by older browsers.
	+ Cons: Older and less optimized for modern web applications.
* **jQuery 2.2.4**:
	+ Pros: Offers a good balance between compatibility with older browsers and some performance improvements.
	+ Cons: Less optimized than newer versions, might require additional code to take advantage of its features.
* **jQuery 3.3.1**:
	+ Pros: Optimized for modern web applications, improved performance, and better compatibility with new browsers.
	+ Cons: Might not be supported by older browsers.

**Library:**

The test case uses jQuery as a library. jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, and other tasks in front-end development. It was widely used before modern alternatives like React, Angular, or Vue.js gained popularity.

In this benchmark, each version of jQuery is tested with the `tests()` function, which is not explicitly defined in the provided code snippet. However, based on the benchmark definition, it appears that the `tests()` function is a custom test case that calls a specific method on the jQuery object.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The test cases only rely on standard JavaScript and jQuery methods.

**Other alternatives:**

If you're looking for alternatives to jQuery, here are some popular options:

* **React**: A library for building user interfaces that uses a component-based approach.
* **Angular**: A full-fledged JavaScript framework for building complex web applications.
* **Vue.js**: A progressive and flexible front-end framework for building web applications.
* **Vanilla JavaScript**: Using standard JavaScript libraries like DOM manipulation, event handling, and more without relying on a specific framework or library.

Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your project's requirements and your personal preferences as a developer.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery version speed test (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: $jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$jq1124

$jq224

$jq331

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):