Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash Chunk vs Native Chunk
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of: Native chunk using slice vs lodash chunk. Similar to https://www.measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/9855/0/native-slice-vs-chunk
Comparing performance of:
Lodash Chunk vs Native Chunk With Slice
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var test = Array.from({ length: 100000 }, () => Math.random()) function chunk(array, size) { const result = []; for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i += size) { result.push(array.slice(i, i + size)); } return result; }
Tests:
Lodash Chunk
_.chunk(test,5000)
Native Chunk With Slice
chunk(test,5000)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash Chunk
Native Chunk With Slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
4 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 15; RMX3939 Build/AP3A.240905.015.A2; ) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/143.0.7499.34 Mobile Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome Mobile 143 on Android
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash Chunk
1373.2 Ops/sec
Native Chunk With Slice
3704.9 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for chunking an array: Lodash's `chunk` function and the native `slice` method. **Chunking Approaches** There are two main approaches being compared: 1. **Lodash Chunk**: The `chunk` function from Lodash is used to split the input array into chunks of a specified size (5000 in this case). 2. **Native Chunk with Slice**: This approach uses the native `slice` method to create chunks of the same size. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash Chunk** + Pros: - More readable code, as it's a higher-level function that abstracts away the details of array manipulation. - Less error-prone, as Lodash handles edge cases and invalid input for you. - Cons: - Potential performance overhead due to the use of a library function. - May have slower execution speed compared to native methods. * **Native Chunk with Slice** + Pros: - Faster execution speed, as it's a native method that doesn't incur any overhead from a library function. - More control over the chunking process, as you can fine-tune the size and behavior of the chunks. - Cons: - More verbose code, as you need to manually implement the chunking logic using `slice`. - May require more expertise in JavaScript array manipulation. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a collection of utility functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array transformation, and more. The `chunk` function is one of its many useful tools for working with arrays. In this benchmark, Lodash's `chunk` function is used to split the input array into chunks. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark that requires explanation. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to chunking an array, here are a few options: * Using `Array.prototype.reduce` and creating chunks manually. * Utilizing a library like **moment** (for date manipulation) or **underscore** (for other utility functions). * Implementing custom array slicing and concatenation logic using loops. However, for simple use cases, the native `slice` method is usually sufficient and efficient.
Related benchmarks:
native slice vs lodash slice
native-slice-vs-chunk
native slice vs lodash chunk
native slice vs native reduce vs lodash chunk
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?