Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
styleProperty
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
set-transform vs style-propery
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div> <img class="js-image"/> </div>
Tests:
set-transform
const imageToScale = document.querySelector('.js-image'); imageToScale.style.transform = `scale(${0.5})`;
style-propery
const imageToScale = document.querySelector('.js-image'); imageToScale.style['--motion-scale'] = "0.5";;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
set-transform
style-propery
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 133 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=587988" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
style-propery
11.9M/s
set-transform
2.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
style-propery
11,903,650 Ops/sec
set-transform
2,127,456 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested, compared options, pros and cons, library usage, special JS features or syntax, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON defines a benchmark named "styleProperty". The benchmark has two test cases: 1. `set-transform`: This test case uses the `document.querySelector` method to select an HTML element with the class `js-image`, and then sets its `transform` CSS property using the `.style` property. 2. `style-property`: This test case is similar to the first one, but instead of setting a JavaScript property, it directly sets a CSS custom property named `--motion-scale` on the selected HTML element. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. Setting a CSS property (`transform`) using JavaScript (`document.querySelector.style.transform = "scale(0.5)"`) 2. Directly setting a CSS custom property (`--motion-scale`) using JavaScript (`imageToScale.style['--motion-scale'] = "0.5"`) **Pros and Cons** Setting a CSS property using JavaScript has the following pros: * Can be more flexible, as it allows for dynamic manipulation of styles. * Can be used in conjunction with other JavaScript features. However, setting a CSS custom property directly may have some cons: * Can lead to vendor prefixing issues if not handled correctly. * May require additional processing on the browser side to handle custom properties. **Library Usage** In both test cases, the `document.querySelector` method is used to select an HTML element. This suggests that the benchmark is testing the performance of different browsers' DOM query implementations. The `style` property access is also a part of this. **Special JS Features or Syntax** Neither of the provided benchmarks uses any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard for modern JavaScript development (ES5+). **Other Considerations** The benchmark likely aims to compare the performance differences between browsers when applying styles using different methods. This could be useful for identifying areas where specific browsers may have performance optimizations or limitations. **Alternatives** If you were to create a similar benchmark, you might consider adding additional test cases that explore other aspects of style application, such as: * Using CSS animations or transitions * Applying styles using vendor-prefixed properties (e.g., `webkitTransform`) * Setting multiple styles on an element at once These additions could provide more comprehensive insights into the performance characteristics of different browsers' DOM query and styling implementations.
Related benchmarks
jquery.css vs getComputedStyle
CSS variables VS Set property
setProperty
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?