Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Css vs javascript add classss
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
java vs css
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<style> .mystyle { color: red; } </style> <div id="myDIV"> I am a DIV element </div>
Tests:
java
document.getElementById("myDIV").style.color = "red";
css
document.getElementById("myDIV").classList.add("mystyle");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
java
css
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between using CSS and JavaScript to add a class to an HTML element. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is empty, which means that the test cases will use built-in methods to manipulate the HTML element, without any additional JavaScript code. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes a simple `<div>` element with an ID of "myDIV" and an inline style that sets the text color to red. This setup allows the benchmark to focus on the difference between using CSS and JavaScript to add a class to this element. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **JavaScript (Java)** The first test case measures the time it takes to use JavaScript's `classList.add()` method to add the "mystyle" class to the HTML element. This approach is more explicit and allows developers to target specific elements with a specific class. **Pros:** * More control over the application logic * Easier to maintain and debug **Cons:** * Can be slower due to the overhead of JavaScript execution * May require additional setup and configuration 2. **CSS (Css)** The second test case measures the time it takes to use CSS to add the "mystyle" class to the HTML element. This approach uses a CSS rule with an ID selector (`#myDIV`) to apply the style. **Pros:** * Typically faster than JavaScript execution, as CSS is executed by the browser's renderer * Can be more efficient for large-scale applications **Cons:** * Less control over application logic, as styles are applied globally or to specific elements * May require additional setup and configuration to ensure proper styling **Library Used: None** There is no explicit library used in these test cases. However, the benchmark assumes that the HTML element's `classList` property is supported by the browser. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax: No** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two basic approaches to add a class to an HTML element. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for adding a class to an HTML element include: * Using inline styles with a string value (e.g., `style="color: red;"`) * Using attribute selectors (e.g., `div[mystyle]`) * Using CSS counters or pseudo-classes These approaches may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, maintainability, and control over application logic. **Benchmark Result** The latest benchmark result shows that the **CSS** approach is significantly faster than the **JavaScript** approach. This suggests that using CSS to apply styles can be a more efficient way to achieve similar results. However, it's essential to note that this result may depend on specific browser and JavaScript engine implementations.
Related benchmarks:
Selector performance in JQuery 345
Css vs javascript add class
Css vs javascript add classre
CSS selector best performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?