Benchmark: pop() vs array.length -= 1

Tests:

Array.pop()
let array = new Array(25) array.pop()
Array.length -= 1
let array = new Array(25) array.length -= 1

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.pop()
Array.length -= 1

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.pop()	27756040.0 Ops/sec
Array.length -= 1	11804821.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.

**Benchmark Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The current benchmark compares two approaches: `pop()` vs `array.length -= 1` (decrementing the array length).

**What's Being Tested?**

The benchmark tests the performance of:

1. **Array.pop()**: This method removes and returns the last element from an array.
2. **Array.length -= 1**: This approach manually decrements the length property of an array.

**Options Compared**

Two options are being compared:

A) `pop()`: Removes and returns the last element from the array, which requires creating a new array with one less element.

B) `array.length -= 1`: Manually decrements the length property of the original array, which can be faster since it doesn't require creating a new array.

**Pros/Cons of Each Approach**

A) `pop()`:

Pros:

* More intuitive and concise syntax
* Easy to read and maintain

Cons:

* Creates a new array with one less element, which can be slower due to memory allocation and copying.

B) `array.length -= 1`:

Pros:

* Faster since it doesn't require creating a new array
* Can be more efficient for large arrays

Cons:

* Less intuitive syntax (requires manual decrementation)
* More prone to errors if not implemented correctly

**Library: JavaScript Array**

The benchmark uses the built-in `Array` object in JavaScript, which provides various methods like `pop()`, `length`, and others. The purpose of this library is to provide a convenient way to manipulate arrays and perform operations on them.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax (None)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark. Both approaches use standard JavaScript syntax.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to compare performance of other array methods, such as:

* `shift()`: Removes and returns the first element from an array.
* `splice()`: Removes elements from an array and returns them in a new array.
* `slice()`: Returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array.

You can modify the benchmark by changing the comparison options to these alternative methods.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The benchmark preparation code is empty, as specified in the provided JSON data. This means that MeasureThat.net assumes that the script and HTML preparation codes are already written and ready for benchmarking.

Related benchmarks:

pop() vs array.length -= 1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Array.pop() vs Array.length -= 1

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.pop()

Array.length -= 1

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):