Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Fill Array
(version: 2)
Fill Array
Comparing performance of:
Fill method vs Loop method
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Fill method
var arr = Array(160).fill("");
Loop method
var arr = []; var line = ""; for (var i = 0; i < 120; i++) { line[i] = ""; arr.push(line[i]); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Fill method
Loop method
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **What is tested?** The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases: 1. **Fill Array**: This test case measures the performance of filling an array with a string value using the `fill()` method. 2. **Loop Method**: This test case measures the performance of filling an array by looping and pushing individual strings to the array. **Options compared** The main options being compared are: * **`fill()` method vs. Loops (push)** + **Pros of `fill()` method:** - More concise and readable code. - Often faster, as it uses a optimized C++ implementation under the hood. + **Cons of `fill()` method:** - May not be suitable for all use cases, as it requires an initial value. - Can lead to unexpected behavior if the array is not initialized correctly. + **Pros of Loops (push):** - More flexible and suitable for all use cases, including arrays that need to be resized or modified dynamically. - Allows for more control over the loop iteration and condition. + **Cons of Loops (push):** - Often slower than `fill()` method due to the overhead of repeated push operations. **Other considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors: * **Performance**: If you need a high performance solution for large arrays or frequent fill operations, the `fill()` method might be a better choice. * **Code readability and maintainability**: If code readability is more important than raw performance, the loop-based approach with explicit push operations might be a better fit. * **Array modifications**: If your array needs to be modified dynamically (e.g., resizing or removing elements), the loop-based approach is likely a better option. **Library usage** There is no library used in these benchmark test cases. The code snippets are self-contained and use only built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in these benchmark test cases. **Other alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider the following options: * **`Array.from()` method**: This method can be used to fill an array with a string value. However, its performance might not be as good as the `fill()` method. * **Custom implementation using `TypedArray`**: You could implement your own optimized filling function using a `TypedArray` (e.g., `Uint8Array`) for more control over data type and storage layout. Keep in mind that these alternatives may introduce additional overhead or complexity, so be sure to profile and benchmark them before making a decision.
Related benchmarks:
fill vs map
Array fill method vs for loop small array
TypedArray fill vs loop
fill vs manual fill
fill test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?