Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
querySelectorAll vs getElementsByTagName
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a> <a></a>
Tests:
querySelectorAll
document.querySelectorAll('a').forEach((element) => {});
getElementsByTagName
const tags = document.getElementsByTagName('a'); for (let i = 0; i < tags.length; i++) {}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelectorAll
getElementsByTagName
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two JavaScript methods for selecting HTML elements: `querySelectorAll` (part of the DOM API) and `getElementsByTagName` (part of the DOM2 API). The goal is to determine which method is faster. **Options Compared** 1. **querySelectorAll**: This method returns a NodeList containing all elements that match the specified CSS selector. It's more flexible than `getElementsByTagName`, as it can handle selectors with multiple conditions. 2. **getElementsByTagName**: This method returns an HTMLCollection of all elements with the specified tag name. It's simpler than `querySelectorAll` but less flexible. **Pros and Cons** * `querySelectorAll`: + Pros: More flexible, can handle complex selectors, and is more modern (introduced in DOM2 API). + Cons: Might be slower due to the overhead of parsing CSS selectors. * `getElementsByTagName`: + Pros: Simpler, faster, and more lightweight. + Cons: Less flexible, as it only returns elements with a specific tag name. **Library/Utility Used** None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, some JavaScript engines (like V8) provide optimizations for `querySelectorAll`, which might affect its performance. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There is no special feature or syntax used in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript and DOM API methods. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare other selection methods, consider: 1. **getElementById**: This method returns a single element with the specified ID. 2. **getElementsByClassName`: This method returns an HTMLCollection of all elements with the specified class name. 3. **querySelector` (introduced in CSSOM2 API): This method is similar to `querySelectorAll`, but it's optimized for CSS selectors and can return more precise results. In a real-world scenario, you might also want to consider using modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery or React to abstract away DOM manipulation complexities. When writing your own benchmarks, make sure to: * Clearly define the problem being measured. * Use standardized methods (like the ones mentioned above). * Document your benchmarking approach and results. * Consider using multiple browsers, devices, and environments to ensure fairness.
Related benchmarks:
querySelectorAll vs getElementsByTagName with two different tag names
querySelector vs. getElementsByClassName nested dom
querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName() - with constant
querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName() - with constant length
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?