Benchmark: querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName() - with constant

HTML Preparation code:

<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>
<a></a>

Script Preparation code:

document.querySelectorAll('a').forEach((element) => {});

Tests:

querySelectorAll
document.querySelectorAll('a').forEach((element) => {});
getElementsByTagName
const tags = document.getElementsByTagName('a'); const l = tags.length; for (let i = 0; i < l; i++) { const element = tags[i]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
querySelectorAll
getElementsByTagName

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two DOM query methods: `querySelectorAll()` and `getElementsByTagName()`. Both methods are used to select elements from an HTML document. The test is run on a constant number of elements, which means that the number of elements returned by each method is fixed.

**Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases:

1. **`querySelectorAll`**: This test case uses the `document.querySelectorAll('a').forEach((element) => {})` script preparation code to select all anchor elements (`<a>`) from the HTML document and iterate over them using a `forEach` loop.
2. **`getElementsByTagName`**: This test case uses the following script preparation code: `const tags = document.getElementsByTagName('a'); const l = tags.length; for (let i = 0; i < l; i++) { const element = tags[i]; }`

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of two query methods:

1. **`querySelectorAll()`**: This method returns a NodeList containing all elements that match the specified CSS selector (`'a'`). The NodeList is live, meaning it updates in real-time when the DOM changes.
2. **`getElementsByTagName()`**: This method returns an HTMLCollection (an array-like object) containing all elements of the specified tag name (`'a'`). The HTMLCollection is not live and does not update when the DOM changes.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **`querySelectorAll()`**:
	+ Pros: Live NodeList, easy to use, and efficient for modern browsers.
	+ Cons: May be slower than `getElementsByTagName()` in older browsers or those with strict security policies.
* **`getElementsByTagName()`**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster in older browsers or those with strict security policies. HTMLCollection is more predictable and consistent than NodeList.
	+ Cons: Not live, may require manual iteration, and less efficient for modern browsers.

**Library/Functionality**

There are no external libraries used in this benchmark. The `forEach` method is a built-in JavaScript function that iterates over an iterable object (in this case, the NodeList returned by `querySelectorAll()`).

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

The benchmark uses the following special JavaScript features:

* **`forEach`**: A built-in JavaScript method for iterating over arrays or iterable objects.
* **`const`**: A keyword used to declare constants in modern JavaScript.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to measure the performance of other DOM query methods, here are some alternatives:

1. `getElementById()`: Returns a single element by its ID attribute.
2. `getElementByTagName()` (alternative name for `getElementsByTagName()`): Returns an HTMLCollection of elements with the specified tag name.
3. `querySelector()` and `querySelectorAll()` (without the `document.` prefix): Can be used to select elements using CSS selectors in modern browsers.

Keep in mind that each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to use depends on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName() - with constant (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: querySelectorAll vs getElementsByTagName

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

querySelectorAll

getElementsByTagName

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):