Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object array using find vs lodash find (new lodash)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
object array find vs object array _.find
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.core.js"></script>
Tests:
object array find
var a = [{marble: "hihi0", text:'hello'}, {marble: "hihi1", text:'a'}, {marble: "hihi2", text:'bc'}]; var b = a.find(item => item.marble === 'hihi1');
object array _.find
var a = [{marble: "hihi0", text:'hello'}, {marble: "hihi1", text:'a'}, {marble: "hihi2", text:'bc'}]; var b = _.find(a, {marble: "hihi1"});
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
object array find
object array _.find
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is tested on the provided JSON?** The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks, `Object array find` and `Object array _.find`, which test the performance of finding an element in an object array using the native `find()` method versus using the `_` library's `_.find()` function. **Options compared:** 1. **Native `find()` method**: The native JavaScript method for finding an element in an array or object. 2. **_ library's _.find() function**: A utility function from the Lodash library that provides a more convenient and expressive way to find elements in arrays or objects. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Native `find()` method**: * Pros: Lightweight, widely supported, and optimized for performance. * Cons: May require more manual effort and error handling, as it relies on array methods that are not available in all environments (e.g., older browsers). 2. **_ library's _.find() function**: * Pros: Convenient, expressive syntax, and better suited for complex search queries or when working with objects. * Cons: Requires an external dependency (the Lodash library), may be slower due to the overhead of a separate library. **Library and its purpose:** The `_` library is a JavaScript utility library that provides a collection of helper functions for common tasks, such as array manipulation, object inspection, and more. The `_.find()` function is a key part of this library, allowing developers to search through arrays or objects in a concise and expressive way. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The benchmark uses the arrow function syntax (`item => item.marble === 'hihi1'`) for filtering elements in the native `find()` method. This syntax is a shorthand for defining small, one-time-use functions and is widely supported in modern JavaScript environments. **Other alternatives:** If using Lodash is not an option, other alternatives to the `_` library's `_.find()` function include: 1. **`Array.prototype.find()`**: Similar to Lodash's `_.find()`, but part of the native Array API. 2. **`Array.prototype.filter()` and `Array.prototype.some()`**: Can be used in combination to achieve a similar effect, though with more manual effort. Keep in mind that these alternatives may require more code and manual logic, making them less concise and potentially slower than using Lodash's `_.find()`.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.find vs Lodash find
Array.prototype.find vs Lodash find 2
Array find vs lodash _.find
native find vs lodash _.find equal
native find vs lodash _.find for objects equality
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?