Benchmark: native find vs lodash _.find for objects equality

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'user': 'joey',  'age': 32 },
  { 'user': 'ross',    'age': 41 },
  { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 }
]

Tests:

array find
users.find(x => x === { 'user': 'joey', age: 32 });
lodash find
_.find(users, { 'user': 'joey', age: 32 });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array find
lodash find

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using native JavaScript (`find`) and utilizing the popular JavaScript library Lodash's `_.find` method for finding an element in an array based on equality comparison.

**Options compared:**

Two options are being compared:

1. **Native JavaScript (`find`)**: This approach uses the built-in `Array.prototype.find()` method, which searches through an array and returns the first element that satisfies the provided testing function.
2. **Lodash's `_.find`**: This approach uses the Lodash library to search for an element in the array based on a predicate function.

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Native JavaScript (`find`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Lightweight and doesn't require any external dependencies.
		+ Native implementation, so it's likely to be optimized for performance.
	* Cons:
		+ May have limitations or quirks due to its built-in nature.
2. **Lodash's `_.find`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Provides a robust and feature-rich way to search arrays.
		+ Often used in production code, so it may be familiar to developers.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires an external dependency (the Lodash library).
		+ May introduce additional overhead due to the library's functionality.

**Library usage:**

The `_.find` method from Lodash is being tested. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this case, it's used to provide a convenient and efficient way to search arrays based on a predicate function.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of native JavaScript (`find`) versus Lodash's `_.find` method for array equality-based searches.

**Other alternatives:**

For similar use cases, other alternatives to Lodash's `_.find` could be:

1. **Array.prototype.every()**: While not designed specifically for finding a single element, this method can be used with a predicate function to achieve similar results.
2. **Array.prototype.some()**: Similar to `every()`, but returns as soon as the first matching element is found, which might be more suitable for array search scenarios.

It's worth noting that there are other libraries or approaches available for array manipulation and searching, such as Ramda, Underscore.js, or even native implementations like `Array.prototype.indexOf()` with a predicate function. The choice of implementation often depends on the specific requirements, performance needs, and personal preferences of the developer.

Related benchmarks:

native find vs lodash _.find for objects equality (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: array find vs lodash find

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

array find

lodash find

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):