Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
bigint prime &
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
int vs bigint
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
int
104723 & 104729
bigint
104723n & 104729n
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
int
bigint
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasurThat.net, where we analyze and compare the performance of different programming languages and their optimizations. The provided benchmark definition json indicates that the benchmark is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript in handling large integers (int) and big integers (bigint). **Benchmark Definition:** * The script preparation code is empty, which means no additional setup or initialization is required before running the benchmark. * The HTML preparation code is also empty, indicating that no specific HTML structure or rendering is necessary for this benchmark. **Options Compared:** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **int**: This option tests the performance of JavaScript's built-in integer type (Number). It measures how many times the value `104723` can be added to itself (`104723 & 104729`) within a second. 2. **bigint**: This option tests the performance of JavaScript's BigInt type, which is designed for arbitrary-precision arithmetic. It measures how many times the value `104723n` (a BigInt value) can be added to itself (`104723n & 104729n`) within a second. **Pros and Cons:** * **int**: Using the built-in integer type has some advantages, such as: + Smaller memory footprint. + Faster access times for small integers. However, it also has some disadvantages: + Limited range and precision, which may not be sufficient for large-scale arithmetic operations. + May not provide accurate results for very large numbers due to integer overflow issues. * **bigint**: Using the BigInt type provides advantages such as: + Arbitrary-precision arithmetic, making it suitable for large-scale operations. + Reduced risk of integer overflow and underflow issues. However, it also has some disadvantages: + Larger memory footprint due to the need to store additional information (e.g., exponent and mantissa). + Slower access times compared to the built-in integer type. **Library and Its Purpose:** The `BigInt` library in JavaScript is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2020. It provides support for arbitrary-precision arithmetic, making it easier to work with large numbers. In this benchmark, the `BigInt` library is used to test the performance of the BigInt type. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of the `n` suffix (e.g., `104723n`) indicates that the value is being passed as a BigInt literal. **Other Alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative ways to measure performance or compare programming languages, consider the following options: 1. **Benchmarking frameworks:** Libraries like Benchmark.js or Benchmark Suite provide more comprehensive benchmarking capabilities and can be used to test various programming languages. 2. **Testing frameworks:** Tools like Jest or Mocha offer testing frameworks that can be used to write unit tests and integrate with benchmarking frameworks. 3. **Virtual machines:** Running benchmarks on virtual machines (e.g., Node.js, V8) provides an isolated environment for testing performance and can help isolate language-specific optimizations. Keep in mind that MeasurThat.net is a specialized platform designed specifically for JavaScript microbenchmarks. While these alternatives can be useful for broader benchmarking needs, they may not offer the same level of specificity or control as MeasurThat.net.
Related benchmarks:
Find prime gaps - with or without intermediate var
FastStringMap test1
FastStringMap test2
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
Underscore each vs while
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?